Can France 2’s famous Muhammad al-Durrah video be a fake?

     - Read TakeAPen’s ‘Call For Action’ on the Home page,
                at
http://www.take-a-pen.org/CallForAction/CFA.html

      

       - and, read down below, Item 2: 

New Evidence against the Al Dura Fraud provided by surgeon

               by Endre MOZES* - 2007DEC17

 

------------------------------

 

READ BELOW:  

1.    The BBC Continues Distorted Reporting - Reader’s Letter by Rona HART,  Jan 15, 2008

2.    New Evidence against the Al Dura Fraud provided by surgeon, Op-ed, Endre MOZES* - 2007DEC17

3.    ‘2503 kids not going to school in Sderot and Gaza -            

       Reader’s Letter to JERUSALEM POST - by Endre MOZES  - September 7, 2007      

4.    R’s Letter: One more Letter about one more BBC Bias - Ilana Rosen – August 1, 2007

5.    R’s Letter: Let fair reporting and truth have a front seatJack Lynes - MAIL on Sunday, July 23

6.    ‘Understanding For Suicide Killers; Less For Their Victims’ - Walter Leaf

Masterpiece Reader’s Letter To the DAILY MAIL, June 22, 2007

7.    Look in the mirror, Jimmy Carter  -  By Jeff Jacoby  (also on our Russian pg)
-----------------------------------------

    In the next frame below; ”From Take-A-Pen’s London correspondent” - read sensational Telegraph article:

“Terror victims are BBC licence-payers, too” - September 7, 2007,

    and many comments, at:  http://www.take-a-pen.org/english/Letter_From_London/LetterFromLondon.htm
--------------------------------------------------

See the following Items in our new English Archives:

8.    Reader’s Letter: Gaza: 'CONFRONTING' Is Not 'JOINING'W. LeafD.TELEGRAPH -May 17

9.    Op-Ed: New Evidence that British Journalism is Biased against IsraelE. Mozes - The Times -May 2

10. Reader’s Letter to The Times - About Baroness Tongue  -  May 7, 2007

11. Israel wants to meet Arabs in sport-  Letter published in The Independent, A. Klausner

12. Both BBC and Palestinians Acknowledge Biased BBC Reporting -Tom Gross

13. ISRAEL'S ARAB PRESIDENT  - Jeremy Last  - 1March 2007 - "My appointment is
     - an answer for those who accuse Israel being an apartheid state"

14. Human Shields Have No Rights In A War Zone - Jock Falkson

15. Reader's Letter: Christians in Bethlehem  Wally Leaf  To: DAILY MAIL 

16. Reader's Letter in The Guardian: Britons to Iranian Holocaust Conference

17. Take-A-Pen to House of Commons' Intl Development Committee

- Evidence Session, updated June 3, 2007

18. New Amnesty Report condemns Hizbollah War Crimes!

19. Reader's Letter: to Chicago Tribune: Muslim Grievances  

20. WATCH OUT for 'Human Rights Watch' and 'Amnesty' cheating! –

Maurice Ostroff’s letter: A critic's first duty is to get his facts right

21. Blatant Hypocrisy- Frederick Forsyth  - Daily Express 

22. Hezbollah's Human Shields    -    The Washington Times,   

23. Arithmetic of Pain   -  Alan DERSHOWITZ, 

24. An Exchange of Letters with the BBC

25.  The BBC pro-Israeli? Is the Pope Jewish? - Martin Walker, The Times

26. The Power of Taking Your Pen ! -  Outstanding Citizen's Letter

27. Reader's Letter: Testament of Youth

28.  BBC - an Accomplice to Terrorism? – Take-A-Pen study updated 

 

1)     The BBC Continues Distorted Reporting.

Covers up to Terrorist Hamas - Biased against Israel

Read factual analysis in Reader’s Letter,  by Rona HART,    January 15, 2008

 

Dear Malcolm Balen,
 
I have just read a report on Ceefax (please see below) and am truly disappointed to see yet another example of one-sided reporting from the BBC. 
 
This account makes no mention of the fact that 35 rockets - 19 Kassam rockets and 16 other types -  have fallen on Israel today - Hamas claimed responsibility.  Also there has been a Katyusha attack on the Israeli town of Ashkelon.
 
Four people were injured as a result of the Kassam attacks on Sderot, and other Israelis were injured elsewhere. A farm hand in Israel, a volunteer from Equador, was shot dead by Palestinian sniper from Gaza.
 
All the above information is available on the web, but not, alas, on the BBC's Ceefax report of today's events in the Middle East
 
In order words, I cannot get the whole, balanced picture from the BBC.
 
The "medical sources and witnesses" seem to be on the Palestinian side of the Gaza border. I wonder why there no comments from Israeli medical sources or witnesses?
 
It may be one of the "deadliest days on record" in terms of casualties, but that is not from lack of trying on the Hamas side, as rockets are sent daily into Sderot and other Israeli towns, villages and kibbutzim.
 
In the final paragraph, Ceefax informs us that Israel sends "frequent" raids, but doesn't mention the even more frequent rocket attacks launched by Hamas onto civilian targets.
 
Finally, referring to Israel's raid, there are the words "which it says", as if there might be some doubt that Israel's actions are prompted by the ongoing attacks from Gaza.  There is no such qualification of the other quotes.
 
Please will you regard this as an official complaint, I am really disappointed that the BBC has fallen to such a level that I cannot rely on its coverage.
 
Sincerely,
 
Rona Hart

UK

--------------------------

2)    New Evidence against the Al Dura Fraud provided by surgeon

       By Endre MOZES*                   -                        2007 December 17

 

More and more experts have arrived at the conclusion during these years, in 2007 in particular, that the famous TV video showing the death of Palestinian boy Muhammad Al Dura on September 30, 2000, is a fraud. Actually, no independent expert is left who still believes that this film is a totally genuine, un-manipulated document. In the hearing of the Al-Dura trial at the Appeal Court of Justice in Paris, on 14 November 2007, the panel of judges and myself in the courtroom heard or saw nothing what convincingly protected the films authenticity. I learned what I could before the hearing. Now, after watching carefully the 18 minute long raw footage, what the France 2 TV channel finally had to present to the judges upon their previous instruction, I became firmly convinced that the film had been manipulated, probably fully staged.

 

But to prove it, is a different matter.

 

That is why it is so significant that one more item has been added to the list of tangible proofs that the France-2 movie and the commentaries about Israel’s guilt in the boy’s killing are parts of a fraud.  Or at least, as probably in the case of the voiceover of France 2’s Charles Enderlin, unfounded accusations were irresponsibly presented as facts, by someone who had not been on the spot but was too easily mislead due to his political pre-conceptions. (It still astonishes how a senior media professional like Enderlin, and a TV station of France 2’s stand, could state and repeat such capital accusations against Israel, based on a sole eye-witness, the heavily involved Gazan Palestinian cameraman, Talal Abu Rahma).

 

The new counter-evidence to the Al-Dura film was provided by senior Israeli orthopedic surgeon Dr Yehuda David, interviewed by Israeli TV Channel 10 on December 12 evening. He told to the camera that his attention was called recently to the fact that he had operated Jamal Al Dura, the father of the boy Mohammed, years before the ominous incident at Netzarim on September 30, 2000, where Jamal was allegedly wounded.

 

Dr David checked this and found full documentation: he really operated Jamal in 1994. The operation was needed because Palestinian thugs had beaten up Jamal brutally, both with blunt tools and with a hatchet, cutting certain tendons, among others on his arm, paralyzing parts of his body. The operation was successful, gave back most of Jamal’s mobility, and was documented as usual. In all these years since September 2000 many skeptics about the authenticity of the France-2 film asked how Mohammed’s and Jamal’s alleged shot wounds and the IDF bullets were never seen, never shown. Now Jamal’s wounds were, but how! Dr David was surprised to see, how pseudo-analysts presented on a propaganda film the cuts of his own operation on Jamal’s hand and the old hatchet wounds on his arms and legs, as if traces of IDF bullets. Photos of these wounds had been in the hospital’s files since 1994! Any expert, Dr David explained, can see at first sight that the exactly straight thin cuts are of surgical origin and no bullet could cause them. 

 

This is further factual evidence against the minuscule remnant credibility of the Al Dura film and the death cult created around it.

 

An interesting and important new hypothesis arises. The recently known documented previous brutalization of Jamal Al Dura by a Palestinian gang may lead to an understanding, why might Jamal have co-operated in staging the fraud. Jamal Al Durra had been known in Gaza as a believer in peace between his people and Israel. The boy Muhammad wore an Arab-Israeli youth peace camp’s T-shirt. Now, tragically, such people were not once threatened by torture and street execution as alleged collaborators with Israel, unless they co-operate in crimes against Israelis, to prove their innocence.  This scenario is worth to be studied.

 

But what, even if the whole Al Dura film is a fraud, as most experts believe today? Some people ask why to wake up now this old ghost. Why? because this case is not an airy ghost but an actively aggressive icon of hatred and murder, which provides pretexts for hate crimes against Jews and Israel until today.  Its significance can not be overestimated. Hundreds of millions have seen, heard and been influenced repeatedly for seven years by the fake accusation of the Israeli army with murder of the boy.

 

The Al Dura accusation has turned out recently to be totally unfounded, possibly deliberately forged. Professional work and perseverance can turn now this case from the accusation of the uninvolved to the accusation and at least moral conviction of the forgers. This may help the return of a more honest global main-stream media we so badly need. Particularly when about Palestinians and Israel.

-----------------

* Endre MOZES is founder chairman of Take A Pen, an international, multilingual grass-roots letter-writing network, since 2001.

---------------------------------------------------------

3)     Reader’s Letter to:

JERUSALEM POST  

      To the Letter Editor                                                                                                September 7, 2007

                                                                                                                               

Sub.: 2503 kids not going to school in Sderot and Gaza

 

Sir, - Re: "Sderot kids to stay away from schools…” (Shelly Paz, Y. Katz, Sep.3): It is commendable you remind Israel and the world that 2500 schoolchildren in Sderot are targeted daily by Hamas terrorist rockets from Gaza since it was evacuated by Israel two years ago.

 

I can not avoid integrating this article with the very different coverage of the same issue by BBC. They regularly downplay the Kassam rockets, emphasizing that these are ‘home-made’ and ‘relatively harmless’. 12 Israeli civilians have been killed by Kassams in recent years. This means, proportionally, above 100 people killed in the UK by rockets. Would the BBC call this harmless?

 

But the worst even the shamelessly biased BBC did recently about Gaza was “Three Palestinian children not going to school today because they were killed by Israelis” by Jeremy Bowen, yesterday on BBC World Service. Bowen, BBC’s Middle East editor, reports like a cunning Hamas spokesman; completely ignores the context; hundreds of Palestinian rockets shot indiscriminately, and insinuates that the children were killed by Israel, instead of stating the fact that they were caught in fire aimed at Palestinian rocket launchers operating among civilians, against civilians.

 

Had Bowen and the BBC been honest they should report about “2503 children not going to school today”.

ENDRE MOZES, Chairman
Take-A-Pen
Haifa

-------------------------------------

 

4)     One more Letter about one more BBC Bias

To: The BBC

August 1, 2007

For the attention of Nuala Hyde

admin@national.core.bbc.co.uk

 

Dear Ms Hyde

Thank you for replying to my email.

I do not feel, however that my concerns have been addressed sufficiently.

Also (I apologise for not mentioning this in my earlier email), there was a significant snub recently by the BBC to a group which was campaigning for the release of Gilad Shalit, Ehud Goldwasser, Eldad Regev and other Israeli soldiers illegally detained by Hamas, Hizbullah and other terrorist organisations. The group approached the BBC to ask if Alan Johnston could be made available to comment and to add his voice to theirs and request their immediate release.  The BBC refused, saying "such an action would compromise their objectivity.

I find this attitude duplicitous, to say the least. Alan Johnston made his support solely for the Palestinians evident in each of his broadcasts from Gaza. I suggest by this that the objectivity of the BBC was compromised before they were approached by the campaign group.

You write " However, it is not always possible or practical to reflect all the different opinions on a subject. Editors are charged to ensure that over a reasonable period they reflect the range of significant views, opinions and trends in their subject area."  I beg to differ. Your brief is to inform the British public and as such when you screen a news story your main purpose should be to do this. You do not, and it is evident.

There is still a widely held view (and not just in the Jewish community) that the BBCs suppression of the Balen Report, which would have showed evidence of bias against Israel, was because it was in their interests to hide it from public view. It is lamentable.

 

Ilana Rosen

UK

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

5)    Reader’s Letter: Let fair reporting and truth have a front seat

    The Editor,

   Mail on Sunday                                                              23rd July 2007

 

Sir, 

In just eighty five words Lauren Booth (Mail on Sunday 22nd.July) shows off her two talents admirably. First to display an imagination beyond compare and secondly as someone able to express in an easy to read and convincing manner her somewhat warped mind.

 

Regrettably her column may be read by some who do not know the truth and may be swayed by her rhetoric. It is not surprising that an Israeli human rights group should put a slant on the facts in pursuance of their arguments but that does not excuse Ms Booth from quoting them without first studying the facts and what may lie behind them. Her implied accusation that Israel is a fascist state is in direct contradiction that they are a democratically elected State, so it is she who is guilty of ignorance when it comes to defining fascism.

 

Ms Booth was certainly having an 'off day' when she accused Israel of shutting off the crossings into Gaza. Were it not for her reputation of biased reporting, it would be hard to explain.  Hamas’ murder of and abject cruelty to their rival Fatah Palestinians is well documented. Arabs, who represent one in five of Israel's population, enjoy complete religious and political freedom.  Unlike in most Arab states, such rights extend also to women. 

 

Long may the likes of Lauren Booth have their freedom to express themselves. And soon may she find a new agenda where fair reporting and truth have a front seat.

 

Jack Lynes.

 Pinner

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

6)    ‘UNDERSTANDING For Suicide Killers; Less For Their Victims’

  A MASTERPIECE of a Reader’s Letter:

 

To: The Editor, DAILY MAIL June 22, 2007

From: e-mail w.leaf@ntlworld.com

Andrew Alexander (June 22) shows understanding for suicide bombers who kill Israeli families in school buses, cafes and shopping areas, but little for their victims.

My own understanding comes from studying evidence that Palestinians are taught hatred from nursery school onwards, with atlases that obliterate Israel and textbooks that demonise Jews. Suicide-bombers are lionised in repulsive Children’s TV programmes and emulated at gruesome “summer camps.” That despicable indoctrination, plus incendiary sermons in the mosques, explains why Israelis are brutally murdered.

Talk of justification is perverse. Three-quarters of the original Promised Land destined for “close Jewish settlement” by international agreement became Jew-free, Arab (Trans)Jordan! Yet, repeatedly - in 1937 (Peel Commission), 1947 (UN Partition Plan), 1967 (Khartoum Denial) and after - a Palestinian state sharing the tiny rump was rejected. That includes Israel‘s offer in 2000 of all Gaza, 97% of disputed Judea/Samaria (the West Bank) and a capital in Jerusalem, centre of the Jewish faith. The “intransigence” is therefore not Israel’s.

What I do not understand is why Mr Alexander should deny the perennially persecuted Jews of all peoples self-determination. Why may they not live in peace in their own UN-voted homeland - where Christians, Muslims and Jews have equal civil and religious rights, unknown elsewhere in the region - after 3,800 years of Jewish presence (despite Islamic invasions, expulsions and riots), when the 21 Arab League states surrounding Israel already occupy 800 times as much land?

(Yours sincerely)

WALTER LEAF
e-mail
w.leaf@ntlworld.com

------------------------------------------------

7)     Jimmy Carter to Guinness Book of World Records
                                                                              by E.M., Take-A-Pen – www.take-a-pen.org    -           May 29, 2007

We wrote not long ago on these Take-A-Pen pages about Jimmy Carter's book "Palestine, Peace not Apartheid" that it may be a promising candidate for the Guinness Book of World Records in a special category, by saying three blatant untruths in a title of only four words: first of all Palestine is not a place or country anywhere, two: Palestinians and Peace are two words which can not be honestly said in the same breath, and, thirdly, any hint to apartheid about Israel is as absurdly untrue as… er…( as to say Jimmy Carter was an excellent president?)
Now Jeff Jacoby, columnist of the Jewish World Review is also contemplating about Jimmy Carter's candidacy for the Guinness Book of World Records in the "Pot Calling a Kettle Black"
category.

Several Americans have already said and written that Carter was probably the worst president the US ever had.  His adversaries laughed at him: the Ayatollah Khumeini said that "Neither does Carter have the guts for military action nor would anyone listen to him."
Jeff Jacoby says now on this point that "It took Americans only four years to realize what a disaster Carter had been; they booted him out in 1980 by a 44-state landslide. 'The worst in history,' he (Carter) says of Bush. Look who's talking."

Read Jeff Jacoby's article here below in English and in Russian at http://www.take-a-pen.org/russian/index.html   

Look in the mirror, Jimmy Carter

By Jeff Jacoby              

Jewish World Review May 25, 2007

 

Gracious as ever, Jimmy Carter says that when it comes to international relations, the presidency of George W. Bush has set an all-time low. "I think as far as the adverse impact on the nation around the world," Carter told the Arkansas Democrat- Gazette last week, "this administration has been the worst in history."

Former presidents don't usually insult their successors quite so overtly, and Carter's slur, not surprisingly, drew international attention. Whereupon he claimed that his remarks had been "maybe careless or misinterpreted" and insisted: "I was certainly not talking personally about any president." No, of course not.

If "Pot Calling a Kettle Black" were a category in the Guinness Book of World Records, Carter would be a shoo-in for the upcoming edition. History's ultimate judgment on Bush may not be known for some time, but its verdict on Carter, who vacated the White House 26 years ago, seems clear enough. And that verdict is: Well, let's just say he would be well advised not to toss around phrases such as "worst in history" when the conversation turns to presidential performance.

Christopher Hitchens this week recalled arguing with Eugene McCarthy, a lifelong liberal who had voted for Ronald Reagan in 1980. McCarthy was unapologetic. Carter, he said, "quite simply abdicated the whole responsibility of the presidency while in office. He left the nation at the mercy of its enemies at home and abroad. He was the worst president we ever had."

The worst of the 20th century, at any rate. During the Carter years, America's international standing went into freefall. The 39th president entered the White House as the tide in the Cold War was turning in the Soviet Union's favor. Vietnam and Cambodia had fallen to the communists, and Marxist governments had seized power in Mozambique, Angola, and Ethiopia as well. Yet the new president went out of his way to dismiss principled anticommunism as foolish paranoia: "We are now free of that inordinate fear of communism which once led us to embrace any dictator who joined us in that fear," he said 30 years ago this week. Instead of acting forcefully to block any further expansion of communist power, Carter sought to appease it.

Before long, he was slashing billions of dollars from the defense budget, cancelling the B-1 bomber program, and ordering US missiles removed from South Korea. He welcomed the Sandinista takeover of Nicaragua and provided the junta with $90 million in aid. He initiated diplomatic relations with Fidel Castro's dictatorship, unperturbed by the thousands of Cuban troops fighting with Marxist forces in Africa. As Moscow engaged in a vast military buildup and cultivated an international network of terrorists, the Carter administration sliced hundreds of intelligence positions at the CIA.

Not until the Soviets invaded Afghanistan did the scales finally fall from Carter's eyes. Moscow's naked aggression, he said, "made a more dramatic change in my opinion of what the Soviets' ultimate goals are than anything they've done in the previous time I've been in office."

Toward those who warned that American weakness was dangerously provocative, Carter was scornful — "simplistic," he said of Reagan in October 1980, "jingoistic . . . shooting from the hip." Toward tyrants and goons, on the other hand, he was creepily unctuous. "A great and courageous leader" who "believes in human rights" was Carter's description of Yugoslav dictator Marshal Tito. To Romania's brutal Nicolae Ceausescu, the president fawned : "Our goals are the same . . . to let the people of the world share in growth, in peace, in personal freedom . . . in enhancing human rights." His sycophancy in the face of malevolence was memorably captured in photographs that showed him kissing Soviet ruler Leonid Brezhnev in 1979, a few months before the invasion of Afghanistan.

Worse yet was the administration's supine response to the seizure of the American Embassy in Tehran later the same year. When Carter hinted that he might use military force to end the crisis and free the 52 US diplomats being held in captivity, he was mocked by the Ayatollah Khomeini. "He is beating on an empty drum," Khomeini sneered. "Neither does Carter have the guts for military action nor would anyone listen to him."

The fruits of Carter's spinelessness, says scholar Steven Hayward, have been bitter. The fall of Iran, he observes, "set in motion the advance of radical Islam and the rise of terrorism that culminated in Sept. 11." By doing nothing to prevent the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, Carter invited an evil from which grew the jihadist violence that is such a menace today.

It took Americans only four years to realize what a disaster Carter had been; they booted him out in 1980 by a 44-state landslide. "The worst in history," he says of Bush. Look who's talking.

http://www.JewishWorldReview.com |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

These Further Items Will Be Transferred Soon to our New English Archives:

 

8)    Reader's letter:
      'CONFRONTING' IS NOT 'JOINING'

The Editor, DAILY TELEGRAPH   via dtletters@telegraph.co.uk     May 17, 2007

(Sir) Both the headline and the item “Israel Joins in Gaza Violence,” (May 17) are misleading.  Israel has no reason to “join in” the factional street-fighting going on there.  Fatah and Hamas terrorists are murdering each other and their families, the much-trumpeted recent Saudi-brokered “pact” between them has proven counterfeit and there is little law and less order.

Israel’s legitimate interest is in protecting its citizens. Ceaseless Palestinian rocketing from Gaza this week hit an Israeli school and a synagogue, serious injuries have occurred, thousands of schoolchildren and others have been traumatised.  In the face of all this, few other countries would have shown so much restraint for so long before hitting back.  Not indiscriminately at ordinary, plain “Palestinians” - the impression left by the seeming reluctance of your Foreign Staff to join up dots - but by pinpointing from the air the murderous thugs behind the rocket attacks.

Yours faithfully

Walter Leaf
Wembley Park
, Middx
(w.leaf@ntlworld.com)

---------------------------------------------------------

9)      Opinion Piece:

To: The Times                                                                                                      2 May 2007

 To the Op-ed Editor

Sir,

New Evidence that British Journalism is Biased

 

During my week-long stay in London I treated myself with reading The Times. I did not always agree with what I read but I always appreciated your sincere strive for balance. Unfortunately it is not the case with much of the mainstream British press today.

I am responding here to all your writings about the NUJ decision to boycott Israel, including your commendable disapproval of this decision. Regarding this I raise if I may a crucial ethical issue of British journalism as a whole.

 

We, Take-A-Pen, are a politically independent, fully volunteer international grass-roots media-watch network, our volunteers around the world follow global media in 18 languages.  We sadly found and said it for years that a large part of the British mainstream media covers the Arab-Israeli conflict and the life in Israel with a strong anti-Israel bias, frequently on the border of propaganda and hate-speech. I am sorry to say that by international comparison the British media is probably the worst in this respect in the world of free press. And please don't tell me that this is only one half of it, or even less than half; the sad fact is that a large part of the apple is, how to put it nicely... rotten.     

 

Our critical remarks sent to the British press about bias, even in thoroughly documented cases, were rarely considered and honestly corrected, like in one case by the Guardian, but were typically simply shrugged off, like by The Independent, or were targeted with legal threats aiming at intimidating us, by The BBC, the self-appointed champion of free speech.. (Seven threatening BBC mails can be shown to the Editor upon request.) 

It would be tempting to elaborate on, what many analysts say and demonstrate with hundreds of examples for years, that the BBC News has been strongly biased.  Recently both Arab sources and the BBC itself declared, for the defence of the kidnapped Alan Johnston, that his and the BBC's activity in Gaza were fully devoted to Palestinian interests. Johnston had been the only Western reporter allowed to work there, you can guess why.

 

So today there is no more need for such circumstantial evidences. Finally, the debate 'whether there is a bias in British journalism?' is concluded, the evidence issued by the most authentic forum on the subject, the British journalists themselves.

The National Union of Journalists' decision to boycott Israel, and Israel alone of all the countries and nations on earth, is full-proof evidence that the representative body of British journalism discriminates Israel and is actively hostile to Israel, what is much worse than bias and totally incompatible with journalistic ethics.

Not much consolation is that parts of the British journalism hate the US probably even more, only do not dare to attack it so openly. Neither is a consolation that the vote was a narrow 64 to 56. If not fifty three but only five percent of British journalists would believe in mediaeval blood libels like that Israel is an apartheid state like ex-South Africa, it would be too much to tolerate.

 

Apartheid!? In fact Israel is probably the first and only country and nation in human history, which, while involved in a long and bloody war with a dreadful enemy, did never do any harm to the ethnic minority akin with that enemy, living within the country.  1.2 million Arabs are living in Israel in relative wealth and with human rights far above those of their brothers' in any of the 23 Arab countries.

Also, we see the UK doing great efforts to proceed further towards racial equality there, but I think Israel does not less, and although lives in a more sensitive situation, has achieved probably more in this respect.

 

Back to our main issue; the British media's bias: I believe that the honest silent majority of the British journalism has to work very hard and with exceptional perseverance in order to cure this severe professional and ethical illness within; both in order to regain its good name and: for pure honesty.

 

Respectfully,

 

Endre MOZES

chairman@take-a-pen.org

Haifa, Israel

 ----------------------------               

(Contact data; for the editor only:…)

 

10)Reader's Letter

(Baroness Tonge's  unfounded accusations of Israel may have deserved for her to be disciplined again…)

 

To: The Editor, The Times,

letters@thetimes.co.uk              May 7 2007
THE CASE IS ALTERED

Sir, In February, Baroness Tonge accused the Israeli army of breaking into a Palestinian school at Abu Dis in the West Bank to “beat up” the boys. Accepting the allegation unquestioningly, she demanded “pressure” on the Israeli government to investigate.

As Lady Tonge’s colleague Lord Steinberg reported, their Foreign Ministry (unpressurised) looked into the case and the army’s report found no units near Abu Dis. Nor were the Border Police involved. The Israel Defence Forces have strict rules of conduct, enforced by courts martial, regarding Palestinian youths - even when they hurl rocks and petrol bombs, shield adult snipers or smuggle suicide belts through checkpoints, having been schooled, from kindergarten through to militaristic “summer camp,” that Paradise awaits if they blow themselves up.

Baroness Tonge’s charges were shown to echo allegations by a body called the Camden Abu Dis Friendship Association. As Dr Jenny Tonge, a Liberal Democrat MP before her ennoblement, she had been disciplined by her party’s leader, it will be recalled, for earlier questionable comments on the Middle East. She has also openly proclaimed her empathy with Palestinian suicide bombers (who have maimed and murdered many Israeli schoolchildren).

Now, however, an opportunity has occurred for Baroness Tonge to establish her unswerving interest in protecting Palestinians at school. An unmistakably genuine case of assault on a Palestinian school has, I see, been reported by the news agency Independent Media Review last weekend. Gunmen attacked a UN-funded (UNRWA) school in Rafah, Gaza, with grenades and machine guns, while the UN director of relief operations, John Ging, himself was at a celebration there. One person was reported killed and six injured, including pupils and relatives. Journalists covering the event were also beaten up by “masked gunmen,” added the report, and a religious group nearby demonstrated, claiming that the celebration broke Islamic law and threatening violence.

Baroness Tonge could, I suggest, underline her integrity by getting her teeth into this quite unarguable attack on a Palestinian school, witnessed by UN personnel and journalists (although it happens to be one of the many cases where Palestinians have assailed Palestinians). Perhaps she could begin by demanding “pressure” on the Palestinian administration to investigate, and maybe keep us informed of the results.

WALTER LEAF
e-mail w.leaf@ntlworld.com
Wembley, Middx

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

These Further Items Will Be Transferred Soon to TakeAPen’s New English Archive:

9/ Reader's Letter:

 

Published in The Independent,     22 March 2007*

 

Israel wants to meet Arabs in sport

 

Sir: Jack Downey in his letter (15 March) chides Israel for not joining its enemies on the sports pitch. Israel has always been willing to play against Arab nations; the problem comes from the other side. Arab states will not permit their teams to compete against Israel.

Since Israel has not been permitted by other Middle Eastern teams to play against them, it competes instead in the European arena, whether in music and song, in sports, or even in trade and industry. When the Arab Middle Eastern nations accept Israel's existence in their midst Israel would be only too happy to compete near home.

ANNE KLAUSNER

PETACH TIKVA, ISRAEL

* Published at http://comment.independent.co.uk/letters/article2381035.ece

* Now published at http://www.take-a-pen.org/english/index.html

And, just watch how short, how meaningful and how agreeable this model Reader's Letter is!  (E.M.)

------------------------------------------------------------------

10)                                                                                                                                    

              Both BBC and Palestinians Acknowledge Biased BBC Reporting

Tom Gross                         14 March 2007

BBC Middle East correspondent Alan Johnston has, unfortunately, been kidnapped by Palestinian gunmen in the Gaza strip.

Impartial observers have long recognized that Johnston is particularly anti-Israeli in his reporting. But now the BBC has acknowledged his bias too. The BBC website, in an article about their kidnapped correspondent, includes a quote from BBC diplomatic editor Paul Adams confirming that Johnston wasn't interested in presenting the Israeli side, but it was "his job to bring us day after day reports of the Palestinian predicament."

The Nablus TV news agency also acknowledges this. In a report specially located and translated for this website / email list, it says: "The Palestinian Journalists Syndicate has issued a call to release Johnston as soon as possible, saying Johnston must not be hurt as he is famous for his opinions which are supportive of the Palestinians."

For more, in Arabic, see: www.nablustv.net/details.asp?newsID=1385&cat=14

The Qatar News Agency also says that Johnston is known for "his quality and objectiveness": www.qnaol.com/linkit.php?date=2007-03-12&no=0127

Last year a Fox News reporter who had been kidnapped in Gaza was released after a ransom was paid by the Fox network (although officially Fox denies this).
 
No one had been charged or convicted of involvement in any of the recent kidnappings of western journalists and aid workers by Palestinian gunmen.

----------------------

Tom Gross - www.tomgrossmedia.com/mideastdispatches/archives/000837.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11)                                                                                                                                    

                ISRAEL'S ARAB PRESIDENT  
                    Jeremy Last                                              -            1st of March 2007
                                     www.totallyjewish.com

 Majallie Whbee .. saying he was proud of being an Israeli citizen, the Druze MK also spoke
of his wish to show the world that Israel is a democratic country with equal rights.
Whbee will serve as ceremonial President until next Tuesday, while acting president Dalia
Itzik is in America.

Whbee, who rose to the rank of colonel during 19 years in a parachute division of the IDF,
said: "This is a very historic day and week because it is the first time that a person from
the minorities has become the president of Israel.
"The important thing for us is that it shows that we can be counterparts, citizens who have
duties and rights. That we actually are a democratic country.

"I think my appointment is the example and answer

for those who accuse Israel of being an apartheid state. It shows minorities have equal rights and we are part of the government, the state and the parliament"
But he warned: "Those people who have a very bad attitude towards Israel will continue with
their thoughts nevertheless"

Although he will only hold the position for a week, he said he wanted to use the opportunity
to try and make some inroads in the peace process, and had already organized meetings with
the Jordanian and Egyptian Ambassadors to Israel.
"I believe I can increase the confidence of the relations between the two sides," said Whbee,
who first entered politics in 1995 as an assistant to then Minister of Infrastructure Ariel
Sharon. "I can talk to these representatives more openly and put my points on the table."

As a Kadima MK Whbee espouses the views of the government and said he was planning to tell the Jordanian and Egyptian ambassadors that he believed there "